ashley.branded

Social Media serves as Personal Branding

Archive for TechCrunch

Blog Action Day 2008: Support Thought. Support Business. Support Humankind

Upon moving to Austin this past spring, I was struck by the amount of entrepreneurs contributing to this city. From tech start ups (too many to name!) to drive through coffee, to cupcakes served from a trailer, Austin is bursting with raw talent and drive. Unfortunately, one of the key elements to a successful business is funding. 

Now, ask any entrepreneur with a great idea and he/she will tell you that the most defeating feeling is to not be able to get an idea out to the public. After all, where is an idea without implementation?

On that note, I recently discovered Kiva, a non-profit that enables individuals to loan a small amount of money to an entrepreneur in need. Over time, the entrepreneur pays this money back to the individual(s) that lent it initially. Unlike my friends and co-workers here in Austin, however, these entrepreneurs are spread across the globe and are working to pull themselves and their families out of poverty. From a seamstress that needs money to fix her sewing machine to a young father in need of money to keep his general store open, the money loaned through Kiva serves an important purpose in lives around the world.

Kiva is not an angel investing service or a bank loan. It is merely a service that supports and facilitates human kindness. Coincidentally, TechCrunch discussed Kiva for Blog Action Day today as well and has formed its own lending team if any readers are interested. 

No innovative individual deserves to be ignored because he/she cannot afford the materials, space, or help necessary. Further, if this innovative thinking will provide a stable income and/or improve one’s means of living, can we not sacrifice $25 to their cause? Support Thought. Support Business. Support Humankind.

TechCrunch Responds to Lawsuit…Yay or Nay?

Considering our recent discussions of instances where professionals respond to the public through social media (ie: Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Apple’s Steve Jobs, etc.), I found this particular story intriguing.

TechCrunch announced this afternoon that it was being sued by Earthcomber, a service that helps you find the local things and places you love. According to Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, this lawsuit is completely unjustified and may even have resulted from a simple miscommunication between himself and Earthcomber president, Jim Brady. 

What caught my attention, however, is how Arrington handled the situation, as well as TechCrunch readers. After reading the title “Earthcomber Sues TechCrunch Out of Spite, Pisses Me Off Personally” one can continue to read and find several other passionate phrases such as “I’m not going to go into a lot of detail on the specifics of the patent claims, other than that they are absurd, since our lawyers have asked me not to,” “I’ve asked our attorneys to spend whatever it takes to kill this lawsuit, and to find a way to counter sue this guy into the stone age,” and finally “I would rather run TechCrunch into the ground and go out of business than let this guy win.” 

As a reader of TechCrunch myself, I understand Arrington’s viewpoints and completely agree with his justifications. However, I wonder if this response is a positive use of communication with an audience or a negative one. Although there is a need to address the lawsuit itself, did Arrington cross the line with his anger towards Brady? Or does it simply not matter for a business that has a large number of loyal followers?

By scrolling down to the reader comments, you will find a great deal of support for Arrington’s statements which illustrates the number of like-minded individuals behind TechCrunch. Is this example then void of what we consider acceptable business behavior, or is Arrington correct in his public rant against Earthcomber?

Online Marketing is Watching You

As we discussed in class, many social networks have begun to target our personal interests, what we are wearing, and even what our friends do that, may in turn, interest us. E-Marketer published an article on Thursday that examines this very phenomenon

According to the article, as members of Generation Y, we are more involved in social media outlets, online shopping, etc. In fact, “some 85% of Gen Y respondents said they participated in social networking, and 57% reported involvement with blogs.” Just as Camella Manges (the Director of St. Edward’s E-Marketing) discussed Thursday in class, businesses, universities, etc. need to adapt their marketing efforts to reflect this online use. Therefore, the article suggests, retailers are marketing to shoppers on their new “turf.” Of the online networks that are the most profitable, Facebook, Myspace, and Youtube reign supreme. Data from a survey done this August indicates that “of the 39.3% of retail respondents that use social networks, 32% have a page on Facebook, 27% on MySpace and 26% on YouTube.”

However, retailers are not only requenting our online hang outs; They need to understand our likes and dislikes. Well, what better source than ourselves? I bet you didn’t even know that you were providing retailers with this information, did you? In fact, you may even communicate what you like without writing what you like. It may simply be what you WEAR

And not to worry if you simply refrain from filling out personal information on sites such as Facebook! Advertisers will still market your friends….and then come after you. According to research done by the Society for New Communications Research, 75% of consumer respondents choose the products and services that their friends chose (E-Marketer). Think about it: Have you ever seen your best friend buy a movie ticket from Alamo Drafthouse and then say, “That must be a great movie-I need to go see it!” Or at the very least…”I feel like seeing a movie too! Hmm…what should I see?” And you pull up the Drafthouse homepage. 

Although this form of adverting may appear invasive, it can also be viewed as extremely convenient. For example, e-marketing using social media is not limited to Facebook examples. When was the last time you googled “cute shirt” or “new fashion styles”? Instead, you most likely saw an advertisement on a blog you read or simply went to a site that congregates several clothing stores and options together such as BlueFly or Amazon

We are the victims of online marketing everyday. How does that make you feel?

PR Takes it to the Blogs

This course continuously pushes me to question the practices of media professionals, as well as myself. This week, we discussed the implications of blogger relations and specifically, how to approach bloggers. Just as I gave the example of our unfortunate friend who wrote into TechCrunch requesting they blog about his new company, there are certain rules involved in pitching story ideas to a blogger.

Brian Solis’s e-book, A Guide to Blogger Relations, details the intricacies of PR/blogger relationships and suggests that many professionals in the PR industry need to improve both their knowledge and practices in regards to blogs.

In his e-book, Solis says, “Oh trust me, I know you’re thinking, ‘Who has time to do this? To dedicate one-on-one time with bloggers in addition to traditional media exceeds the amount of hours in a day!’ Let me say this as clear as possible, ‘make the time'” (Solis 10). 

Solis proposes a legitimate problem. However, it is not simply that there is not enough time in the day to dig through material on both mainstream media and blogs (or simply mainstream if you believe that blogging is mainstream, as Technorati asserts). But rather, how does PR as a whole deal with Social Media, and specifically-blogging? If there are mixed feelings on whether blogs are a legitimate concern and source of information, then how does one compare the use of Social Media from one PR firm to the next? In other words, Social Media may be creating enormous barriers between the PR industry itself. 

In fact, Solis even suggests that some PR professionals (or perhaps un-professionals) are marketing Social Media as a service that they provide to clients when in fact they have no experience or understanding of what it is and how to use it (Solis 12). In my opinion, Social Media tools have become vital to the sustainability of a company and yet, many companies simply choose to ignore them or advertise that they understand, when really, they do everything they can to avoid them.  

Solis outlines 10 steps for PR agents to adhere by: 

1. What do you stand for? Answer that first before you try to convince people that are busier than you why they should take time to stop what they’re doing to pay you any attention. 

2. It’s more than doing your homework. To some doing homework is building lists. Figure out what your are representing and why it matters.  How does it compare to other things. What do people need? What are their pains? 

3. Practice saying it aloud in one to two minutes or less to a friend or in front of a mirror. Seriously. It works. If you don’t get it no one else will. 

4. Less is more. Find the right people, not just because you read their profile in a database, but because you read their work and understand their perspective. 

5. Engage in conversations outside of when you need something. 

6. Build relationships not lists. 

7. Humanize the process and remember that this is about people 

8. Stop whining and making excuses. You are responsible for your actions so arm yourself with what you need to be successful. 

9. Stop sending press releases without summarizing what the news is and why it is IMPORTANT to the individual person you’re sending it to. 

10. Remember the reputation and the future of PR is on you. If you’re not in this to do your job better, then ask yourself why you’re here. If you’re not part of the solution, then you’re part of the problem (Solis 20).

I completely agree with each of Solis’s points, but would also suggest one more: 

11. Provide information yourself. A person is only as reputable as what they produce and if you don’t produce anything worthwhile yourself, no one will believe that what you are pitching is worthwhile.

This applies to representatives as well as entire agencies. I feel that it is extremely important for PR firms to maintain blogs themselves. It is simply hypocritical to claim an understanding for the importance of Social Media (blogging specifically) if one does not participate in it. As a blog editor, I would personally be more apt to accept a story pitch if I knew that the pitcher understood blogging themselves and contributed useful material to the blogosphere.